Chereshnia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Krylia]] claimed Chereshnia on June 10, 2024, a move that initially sparked controversy. Many players questioned why [[Ciemnydębowylas]], which had a building and active resource gathering, wasn’t considered Krylian, while Chereshnia, with no structures or resource gathering, was included. The controversy eased when [[Ciemnydębowylas]] was admitted to [[Krylia]] on June 22, 2024. | [[Krylia]] claimed Chereshnia on June 10, 2024, a move that initially sparked controversy. Many players questioned why [[Ciemnydębowylas]], which had a building and active resource gathering, wasn’t considered Krylian, while Chereshnia, with no structures or resource gathering, was included. The controversy eased when [[Ciemnydębowylas]] was admitted to [[Krylia]] on June 22, 2024. | ||
The debate over Chereshnia’s ownership resurfaced when some players questioned the validity of the claim, with one even | The debate over Chereshnia’s ownership resurfaced when some players questioned the validity of the claim, with one even claiming a house in the area. While the claim has been removed, and while the issue has quieted, it remains a topic that could be reignited. | ||
Revision as of 02:00, 3 December 2024
- This article is a stub. You can help us by expanding it.
Flag
| Admitted to the Union of Krylia | June 10th, 2024 |
|---|
Geography
Chereshnia is a mountainous cherry forest region located in the eastern area of Krylia. The region sees very little player activity.
Controversy Surrounding Krylian Ownership
Krylia claimed Chereshnia on June 10, 2024, a move that initially sparked controversy. Many players questioned why Ciemnydębowylas, which had a building and active resource gathering, wasn’t considered Krylian, while Chereshnia, with no structures or resource gathering, was included. The controversy eased when Ciemnydębowylas was admitted to Krylia on June 22, 2024.
The debate over Chereshnia’s ownership resurfaced when some players questioned the validity of the claim, with one even claiming a house in the area. While the claim has been removed, and while the issue has quieted, it remains a topic that could be reignited.